A lens

Value alignment

Do the parts evaluate outcomes in sufficiently similar ways?

Value alignment concerns what components treat as good, bad, desirable, or worth preserving. It is one important form of alignment, but it neither guarantees coordination nor is required for every kind of coordinated system.

Try seeing it

Ask what the parts care about, not merely what they do.

Two people may behave similarly for very different reasons. Conversely, people who value many of the same things can still disagree about goals, facts, procedures, or appropriate action.

Value alignment therefore identifies one relationship among components, not a master variable from which all other alignment follows.

Distinguish from

Goal alignment

Components can pursue the same immediate objective while differing in their broader evaluations or reasons for pursuing it.

Distinguish from

Behavioral alignment

Appropriate-looking behavior does not uniquely reveal the values that produced it.

Distinguish from

Alignability

A component can be redirectable through its environment without adopting the values of whoever redirects it.

A question to carry elsewhere

If these components valued exactly the same outcomes, which alignment problems would still remain?