What can be true
The goal is shared
The participants genuinely intend or prefer the same outcome.
A dissociation
Shared goals ≠ coordinated behavior
Agreement about what should happen does not make it happen.
A shared objective can leave the concrete organization of action radically underspecified. Goal alignment therefore does not by itself establish behavioral or coordinative alignment.
≠
What does not follow
Action is coordinated
Their plans may still be vague, incompatible, mistimed, incomplete, or never carried out.
A familiar gap
Intending is not implementing.
People routinely form genuine intentions that fail to become action. Making the implementation more concrete — when, where, and how to act — can substantially improve follow-through.
The alignment lesson is broader than individual self-control. Shared goals leave open the architecture that turns intention into organized behavior.
What this reveals
Goals can constrain action without determining it.
Once the desired outcome is specified, many further questions remain: who acts, when, in response to what information, with which role, and how conflicts among local actions are resolved.
Try this elsewhere
Take a group that sincerely agrees on what it wants. Now remove its roles, procedures, timing, and feedback.
How much alignment is left?