Goals → behavior
People can genuinely want the same outcome while failing to
translate that agreement into compatible plans or behavior.
Example: strong intentions often fail without concrete
implementation procedures.
Similarity → accuracy
Epistemic similarity can suppress the diversity of information
that makes collective judgment useful.
Example: social influence can increase confidence and consensus
while reducing wisdom-of-crowds performance.
Similarity → function
Functional systems often depend on components doing different,
complementary, or even opposing things.
Example: muscles, soccer positions, and conversational roles.
Parts → whole
Local competence or success can combine into an unwanted
higher-scale outcome.
Example: individually reasonable local behavior can generate
segregation, cancer, or unwanted multi-agent outcomes.
Agreement → concordance
Compatible trajectories do not require common values, goals,
beliefs, or preferences.
Example: buyers and sellers can want opposite outcomes and still
coordinate through a market.
Values → Relevance
A system can care about the right outcome and still fail because it does not notice the relevant difference, recognize the situation, or perceive an available response.
Example: a driver can genuinely care about pedestrian safety yet fail to notice that someone is about to enter the road.
Alignability → Values
Changing its incentives, constraints, or environment can redirect behavior
while its underlying objectives remain the same.
Example: firms change their behavior in response to prices while remaining profit maximizers
Performance → Robustness
Two systems can behave identically in familiar conditions and diverge
when they are perturbed.
Example: Two drones can hover equally well in still air. A sudden gust reveals that one can detect the deviation and recover while the other drifts away or crashes.
Behavior → Development
An intervention affects not only current behavior but the current trajectory, which can lead to unintended consequences.
Example: A daycare fine changed not only behavior but how the interaction was understood.
Goals → Relationships
Cooperation involves a shared relational picture, not just shared goals.
Example: Two collaborators may share the goal while disagreeing about authority, obligation, or which decisions require mutual agreement.