A dissociation

More similarity ≠ better function

Components can become less behaviorally similar while the whole becomes more functionally aligned.

Alignment is often pictured as convergence: the parts come into agreement, synchronize, or behave more alike. But many competent systems work through differentiation and compensation instead.

What can increase

Behavioral similarity

Components match one another more closely in state, timing, or action.

≠

What need not increase

Functional alignment

The larger task may depend on differentiated contributions rather than matching ones.

A revealing case

The body can stabilize a task by letting the parts vary.

In motor synergies, many component variables can change while a task-relevant variable remains comparatively stable.

Compensation among components means that variability at the lower level can be part of how stability is produced at the higher level.

What this reveals

Alignment has a geometry.

Some systems align through convergence or matching. Others align through complementarity, specialization, compensation, or organized opposition.

Asking only whether the parts are becoming more similar can therefore miss the very structure that makes the whole competent.

Try this elsewhere

Find a system whose components would perform worse if they were forced to behave more similarly.